ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: To know the limitations that the students encountered during the undergraduate surgery course during COVID-19 pandemic. METHOD: Through an online questionnaire, students were asked about the evaluation of the undergraduate surgery course, the limitations encountered during the course, both those perceived by themselves, and the limitations they perceived in teachers. Questions were asked about the total evaluation of the surgery course and the clinical part of the course. RESULTS: 63 students of the subject of surgery were included. The most mentioned limitations of the students were the availability of schedule and teaching material. The most mentioned limitation in relation to the teachers was the lack of technical knowledge. A relationship was found between the evaluation of the course and the interaction between the teacher and the student. CONCLUSIONS: The medical education have undergone great changes, especially the clinical part. There are several limitations in this process that can be improved by teachers and students and the perception of the quality of the course is related to the degree of interaction that teachers had with the students.
OBJETIVO: Conocer las limitaciones que los estudiantes encontraron durante el curso de pregrado de cirugía durante la pandemia de COVID-19. MÉTODO: Mediante un cuestionario en línea, se interrogó a los estudiantes acerca de la evaluación del curso de cirugía de pregrado y las limitaciones encontradas durante el curso, tanto las percibidas por ellos mismos como las que percibieron en sus maestros. Se preguntó acerca de la evaluación total del curso de cirugía y de la parte clínica del curso. RESULTADOS: Se incluyeron 63 estudiantes de la materia de cirugía. Las limitaciones de los estudiantes más mencionadas fueron la disponibilidad de horario y de material didáctico. La limitación más mencionada en relación a los maestros fue la falta de conocimientos técnicos. Se encontró relación entre la evaluación del curso y la interacción que se tuvo entre el maestro y el estudiante. CONCLUSIONES: La educación en medicina ha sufrido grandes cambios, sobre todo la parte clínica. Existen diversas limitaciones en este proceso que pueden mejorarse por parte de maestros y estudiantes, y la percepción de la calidad del curso está relacionada con el grado de interacción que los maestros tuvieron con los estudiantes.
Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Humans , COVID-19/prevention & control , Pandemics/prevention & control , Retrospective StudiesABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: Despite being widely used as a screening tool, a rigorous scientific evaluation of infrared thermography for the diagnosis of minimally symptomatic patients suspected of having COVID-19 infection has not been performed. METHODS: A consecutive sample of 60 adult individuals with a history of close contact with COVID-19 infected individuals and mild respiratory symptoms for less than 7 days and 20 confirmed COVID-19 negative healthy volunteers were enrolled in the study. Infrared thermograms of the face were obtained with a mobile camera, and RT-PCR was used as the reference standard test to diagnose COVID-19 infection. Temperature values and distribution of the face of healthy volunteers and patients with and without COVID-19 infection were then compared. RESULTS: Thirty-four patients had an RT-PCR confirmed diagnosis of COVID-19 and 26 had negative test results. The temperature asymmetry between the lacrimal caruncles and the forehead was significantly higher in COVID-19 positive individuals. Through a random forest analysis, a cut-off value of 0.55°C was found to discriminate with an 82% accuracy between patients with and without COVID-19 confirmed infection. CONCLUSIONS: Among adults with a history of COVID-19 exposure and mild respiratory symptoms, a temperature asymmetry of ≥ 0.55°C between the lacrimal caruncle and the forehead is highly suggestive of COVID-19 infection. This finding questions the widespread use of the measurement of absolute temperature values of the forehead as a COVID-19 screening tool.